Rationality, institutions and environmental policy

By A. Vatn. 2005

329 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a48c82b980f55e20b52260d4fb51d123f081733

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view (2010, background): “At a more fundamental level, though, it should first of all be recalled that the framing of environmental issues in terms of externalities is not without difficulty, as it tends to epistemologically lock-in both problems and solutions (Vatn, 2005).”
Environmental Policy Theory Given Bounded Rationality and Other-regarding Preferences (2011, unknown): “Several authors have attempted to use alternative models of individual behavior to provide a foundation for the theory (or theories) of environmental policy and institutions (Ostrom 1990; Sanstad and Howarth 1994; Norton et al. 1998; van den Bergh et al. 2000; Shogren 2002; Vatn 2005).”
An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services (2010, background): “Following the perspective of classical institutionalism (Vatn, 2005), three sets of core questions can be identified when studying governance structures like PES.”
Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, background): “It presents a strong warning against using the wrong instruments (Vatn 2005) as actions that were originally driven by cultural perceptions of “good farming” practice may become dependent on monetary stimuli.”
Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability (2017, background): “One reason for the conflict between ES providers and PES programs may derive from the values articulated by these programs and conventional environmental conservation (Vatn, 2005; Olmsted et al., in prep; Chapman et al., in prep).”
Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives (2006, background): “However, reasons for this position go beyond methodological justifications because the whole idea of consumer sovereignty, so crucial formodernwelfare theory, hinges upon the assumption (Vatn, 2005).”
The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes (2010, background): “As suggested by Vatn (2005) economic values and valuation processes are culturally constructed, and as such act as value articulating institutions, i.e., “constructed set of rules or typifications”.”
Transaction costs and environmental policy design (2013, background): “Classical (also referred to as old or original) institutional economics has also examined environmental and natural resource issues (e.g., Bromley, 1991; Schmid, 2004; Vatn, 2005) and it is mentioned in some seminal textbooks on environmental economics (Randall, 1981; Pierce and Turner, 1990).”
The Shallow or the Deep Ecological Economics Movement (2013, methodology): “In ecological economics there have been calls for discursive ethics (O'Hara, 1996), and for approaches paying attention to participation, value pluralism and value articulating institutions (Lo and Spash, 2013; Vatn, 2005).”
Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. (2014, result): “This finding is consistent with current theoretical debate about the role of methodological assessment techniques as value-articulating institutions (Jacobs, 1997; Vatn, 2005) where the methods use to elicit value actually define the values elicited (Brondizio et al.”
Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool (2012, background): “In this respect the framing and the outcome of the assessment runs the risk of becoming unacceptable or even irrelevant to stakeholders/decision makers and thus not particularly useful for the decision making process (Spash, 2000; Vatn, 2005).”
Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder (2010, background): “While institutional economists are very well represented within ecological economics and provide excellent input (see, for example, Söderbaum, 2000; Vatn, 2005; Bromley, 2007), the perspective that markets and institutions, across scales, work together still needs to become more integral formore…”