Social support interventions: do they work?

By B. E. Hogan, W. Linden, B. Najarian. Clinical Psychology Review, 2002

849 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/896fd57333a6cdb88677352cada9122b31e47589

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Family–Professional Partnerships and Parenting Competence, Confidence, and Enjoyment (2007, background): “A review of social support interventions by Hogan, Linden, and Najarian (2002) provides additional support for the relationship between enabling experiences and empowering consequences.”
John Henryism, Depression, and Perceived Social Support in Black Women (2014, background): “The size and amount of support can vary, and the function can be emotional, instrumental, and/or informational (Hogan et al., 2002).”
Social Support: A Review (2011, positive): “…the effi cacy of social support groups by comparing people who have actually participated in such groups with those who have been waitlisted for participation and/or with nonparticipants, and these studies have generally found benefi cial eff ects (see Hogan & Najarian, 2002 for a review).”
Community Resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities, and Strategy for Disaster Readiness (2008, background): “Social support interventions are most effective when they build social skills and mutual support (Hogan et al. 2002).”
Social networks and health: A life course perspective integrating observational and experimental evidence (2009, background): “Indeed, in a review of 100 social support interventions, Hogan and colleagues (Hogan et al., 2002) concluded that, “the most salient problem is that most studies examining efficacy of support interventions failed to include a measure of social support” (p. 425).”
Social Support and Developmental Psychopathology (2015, background): “In a recent review article, Hogan, Linden, and Najarian (2002) asked, “Social support interventions: Do they work?””
The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression : two longitudinal studies (2008, neutral): “If gratitude is shown to lead to perceived social support, then this will be suggest a potential role for gratitude in social support interventions (see Hogan et al., 2002).”
A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of an Abbreviated Social Support Instrument: The MOS-SSS (2008, background): “In an extensive review of 100 social support interventions, Hogan, Linden, and Najarian (2002) noted that “far and away, the most salient problem is that most of the studies examining efficacy of support interventions failed to include a measure of social support” (p. 425).”
Self-efficacy, social support and well-being The mediating role of optimism (2006, background): “Hogan, Linden, and Najarian (2002) and Rhodes (2004) suggest that individuals with more supportive families or friends have a better health status and they recover faster from health problems, compared to persons who are less socially integrated.”
Handbook of Health Psychology (2001, background): “, cognitive behavior therapy, marital therapy), formats (formal support group, professional support, family, dyadic or individual delivery), intervention targets (individuals, couples, family members, peers), dosage, and degree of “purity” of social support as an active ingredient in the interventio”