Mapping the Contours of Contemporary Positive Psychology
121 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/892c1b37990e787b7086278c6c10e650341de889
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- A. Hassankhan
- D. Vella‐Brodrick
- Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Nicola Swain
- D. Quinlan
- C. Cameron
- Tom Hendriks
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- A. Hassankhan
- D. Vella‐Brodrick
- Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Nicola Swain
- D. Quinlan
- C. Cameron
- Tom Hendriks
In Social Psychology
- A. Hassankhan
- D. Vella‐Brodrick
- Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra
- Ernst T. Bohlmeijer
- Nicola Swain
- D. Quinlan
- C. Cameron
- Tom Hendriks
Citations in the corpus
- How ‘other people matter’ in a classroom-based strengths intervention: Exploring interpersonal strategies and classroom outcomes (2015, methodology): “This approach, characterised by one research group as self-contained individualism (Hart & Sasso, 2011), raises the question: If other people really matter, why has their impact on strengths interventions not been assessed or utilised to enhance relationships and group morale?”
- Character Strengths and Intellectual and Developmental Disability: A Strengths-Based Approach from Positive Psychology (2017, unknown): “Just like the study of character strengths, the field of positive psychology has seen significant growth, with more than 20,000 articles published under this paradigm in the last two decades (Hart & Sasso, 2011).”
- The Efficacy of Multi-component Positive Psychology Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2020, background): “Since its inauguration in 1998, the movement has made a considerable impact on the scientific community, with an exponential growth of publications (Donaldson et al. 2015; Hart and Sasso 2011; Hendriks et al. 2018b; Kim et al. 2018; Rusk and Waters 2013).”
- Character Strengths Interventions: Building on What We Know for Improved Outcomes (2011, background): “This approach, characterised by one researcher as ‘self-contained individualism’ (Hart and Sasso 2011), begs the question: If other people really matter, why has their impact on strengths interventions not been assessed or utilised? These relationships could potentially be enlisted to increase the e”