Benchmarking water-use efficiency of rainfed wheat in dry environments

By V. Sadras, J. Angus. 2006

301 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8926bdc4d2411665be4b9fc9951b0a14564dd8b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Yield Gap and Production Gap of Rainfed Winter Wheat in the Southern Great Plains (2014, methodology): “This finding agrees with results found in southeastern Australia where environment accounted for a greater proportion of grain yield variation than management practices or cultivars (Anderson, 2010; Anderson et al., 2005).”
Maximum Attainable Wheat Yield and Resource‐Use Efficiency in the Southern Great Plains (2015, background): “Still, the WUE values we reported are well below maximum wheat WUE values derived from boundary functions analysis between seasonal water supply and grain yield which generally lie around 16 to 22 kg ha–1 mm–1 (Passioura, 2006; Patrignani et al., 2014; Sadras and Angus, 2006).”
Factors affecting the potential contributions of N2 fixation by legumes in Australian pasture systems (2012, methodology): “…N2 fixed and DM production in the absence of limiting factors, in a manner akin to the approach pioneered by French and Schultz (1984) and subsequently applied by many others (e.g. Sadras and Angus 2006) to describe a physiological maximum for plant water-use efficiency (WUE, kg DM/ha.mm rainfall).”
Wheat physiology: a review of recent developments (2011, background): “Sadras and Angus (2006) suggest that the slope for modern varieties could now be approaching 22 kg/ha.mm.”
Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems (2007, background): “The points illustrate the range of farmers’ experience and are typically well below the solid line because of difficulties with weeds, disease, poor nutrition, frost, and other problems (from Sadras and Angus 2006, copyright CSIRO Publishing)”
The limit to wheat water-use efficiency in eastern Australia. II. Influence of rainfall patterns (2007, background): “mm for Horsham (Sadras and Angus 2006) and a gradient of 0.”
Agronomic Practices for Reducing Wheat Yield Gaps: A Quantitative Appraisal of Progressive Producers (2019, unknown): “Thus, we compared the relationship between grain yield and crop evapotranspiration (ETc) simulated for each field-year with previously reported boundary functions for wheat water productivity (French and Schultz, 1984; Zwart and Bastiaanssen, 2004; Sadras and Angus, 2006; Patrignani et al., 2014; Lo”
Yield gap analysis of field crops: Methods and case studies (2015, background): “Source: Sadras and Angus 2006 .”
Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 3. Relevance of APSIM to commercial crops. (2009, background): “The observed yield gap between farm and experimental or modelled yields (Davidson 1962; Sadras and Angus 2006) is in contrast to the claims by Carberry et al. (2002) that simulated yields from APSIM tested well against commercial yields obtained on farms.”
Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review (2013, background): “boundary function for cereal crops water productivity is shown (solid line), with x-intercept and slope equal to 60 mm and 22 kg ha mm−1, respectively (Sadras and Angus, 2006) and an upper yield limit of 15.”