Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice

By Paul Glimcher, M. Dorris, Hannah M. Bayer. Games Econ. Behav., 2005

317 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hierarchical Active Inference: A Theory of Motivated Control (2018, background): “, homeostatic drives, incentive values, rewards [11,12]), where both are essential for learning, planning and behaviour.”
Free markets and fettered consumers (2006, unknown): “…Berridge (2003), Bhatt and Camerer (2005), Bozarth (1994), Camerer (2005), 2 Damasio (2005), Dickhaut et al (2005), Fehr et al (2005), Fehr (2004), Glimcher et al (2005), Laibson (2005), McCabe et al (2001), McClure (2004), Rosfeld et al (2005), Rustichini et al (2003), Sanfey et al (2003),…”
NEUROBIOLOGY OF ECONOMIC CHOICE: A GOOD-BASED MODEL (2011, methodology): “Thus the good-based model is in contrast with actionbased models, according to which choices are ultimately made by comparing the value of different action plans (Glimcher et al. 2005, Rangel & Hare 2010).”
Do People Make Decisions Under Risk Based on Ignorance? An Empirical Test of the Priority Heuristic Against Cumulative Prospect Theory (2008, background): “8 Converging evidence for this view is provided by research that shows that even lower animals that are not able to use deliberate processing in decision making (i.e., sticklebacks), select mating partners based on a weighted compensatory information integration (Kunzler & Bakker, 2001; see also Gl”