Evolutionary Theories in Environmental and Resource Economics: Approaches and Applications

By Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh, J. Gowdy. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88f9e664a089c18c523d55c633179025c442609c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. Kallis
2. R. Norgaard
3. J. Bergh
4. J. Gowdy
5. C. Rammel
6. C. Kimmich
7. S. Villamayor‐Tomas
8. Tom P. Evans

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. G. Kallis
2. J. Bergh
3. R. Norgaard
4. J. Gowdy
5. T. Elmqvist
6. Daniel W. O’Neill
7. C. Spash
8. L. Tacconi

Citations in the corpus

• Coevolutionary ecological economics (2010, background): “Extinction of keystone species has far reaching evolutionary effects and cannot be valued like any other species (van den Bergh and Gowdy, 2000).”
• Resilience: An Evolutionary Approach to Spatial Economic Systems (2001, background): “It then follows that: “Evolving economic systems may also be described as being more or less resilient, in terms of being adaptable to economic changes as well as environmental changes, due to some redundancy of capacity and information present in them” (van den Bergh and Gowdy, 2000, p. 20).”
• Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: adaptive flexibility and risk minimising (2003, background): “…and models can be usefully employed to study sustainable development and environmental policies that foster it (Norgaard, 1994; Clark et al. 1995; Ring, 1997; Allen, 1997; Norton et al. 1998; van den Bergh and Gowdy, 2000; Mulder and van den Bergh, 2001; van den Bergh, 2003a,b; Rammel, 2003).”
• Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative (2010, background): “The onus is on policy makers to set policy targets and to design instruments that make us move in the right direction [53] (see also below).”
• The water-energy-food security nexus through the lenses of the value chain and the Institutional Analysis and Development frameworks. (2015, background): “Finally, the combined framework is better suited to test and build theories about institutional performance (Acheson, 2006) than it is to study how these institutions emerge and change (Van den Bergh and Gowdy, 2000; Vatn, 2005; Ostrom and Basurto, 2011).”
• The microfoundations of macroeconomics: an evolutionary perspective (2003, background): “Georgescu-Roegen (1989) argues that Schumpeter’s views of economic evolution through gales of “creative destruction” anticipated current views of biological evolution as occurring in discontinuous jumps (Gowdy and Mesner 1998, Mesner and Gowdy 1999).”