Transfer appropriate forgetting: The cue-dependent nature of retrieval-induced forgetting.
By T. Perfect, Louisa-Jayne Stark, J. Tree, Chris J. A. Moulin, L. Ahmed, R. Hutter. 2004
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88e97a1f6d5d185b9aa3b38763383be66cbd31d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- When does Retrieval Induce Forgetting and When does it Induce Facilitation? Implications for Retrieval Inhibition, Testing Effect, and Text Processing (2009, background): “Notably, though, the magnitude of retrieval-induced forgetting is typically smaller (and sometimes absent) with independent probes than that with studied (or intra-list) cues (Camp, Pecher, & Schmidt, 2007; Camp, Pecher, Schmidt, & Zeelenberg, in press; Perfect et al., 2004; Williams & Zacks, 2001),”
- Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting (2013, methodology): “In addition, Perfect et al. (2004) pointed out that in later experiments (Anderson & Spellman, 1995) a sizable RIF 3 We verified this conclusion using a version of the SAM model in which the strong items were assumed to be inhibited (by decreasing their strength prior to the start of the retrieval…”