The current status of measures of spirituality: A critical review of scale development.

By A. Kapuscinski, K. Masters. 2010

275 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Spiritual and religious competencies for psychologists. (2013, background): “Kapuscinski and Masters (2010) recommend both deductive and inductive methods when creating scales relevant to religion and spirituality, because of the wide variety of definitions of terms.”
Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices (2017, methodology): “Previous studies have also found expert opinion to be the most common qualitative method for the elimination of unsuitable items (Kapuscinski and Masters 2010; Ladhari 2010).”
Is youth spiritual development a universal developmental process? An international exploration (2012, background): “To a degree, the literature in recent decades has proposed, without consensus, that spirituality is more individually constructed and religion is more socially constructed (e.g. Hill & Pargament, 2003; Hill et al., 2000; Kapuscinski & Masters, 2010).”