Reconciling Internalization Theory and the Eclectic Paradigm

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The determinants of tax haven FDI (2016, background): “Rugman (2010) argues that the essence of the eclectic paradigm is that the O, L, and I advantages all interact to produce a ‘‘coevolutionary’’ explanation of the patterns of overseas FDI at the industry level.”
Motivations of manufacturing reshoring: an interpretative framework (2016, unknown): “Essentially, Internalization theory applies TCT and RBV to explain the efficiency aspects of multinational firms (Rugman, 2010).”
Bringing it all back home? Backshoring of manufacturing activities and the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies (2019, background): “Through the lens of internalisation theory (Buckley and Casson, 1976; Casson, 2013; Rugman, 2010) and Dunning’s “eclectic paradigm” (Dunning, 1980, 1998) backshoring is a result of changes in the ownership, location and/or internalization advantages from international production, or a consequence of”
Offshoring and Reshoring: An Update on the Manufacturing Location Decision (2013, methodology): “This theory is employed in the economics and international business literature to provide insight into foreign direct investment decisions (FDI) (Dunning, 1988; Rugman, 2010).”