Dimensions of Relationship Quality

By M. Hassebrauck, B. Fehr. 2002

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/88a26d2e4dcf6ed9679e8008832ae63e5b312d41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Attachment orientations, sexual functioning, and relationship satisfaction in a community sample of women (2007, background): “In turn, sexual frustration and dissatisfaction may lead to relationship conflict (e.g., Birnbaum et al., in press; Hartman, 1983; Hassebrauck & Fehr, 2002 ), thereby generating a self-amplifying cycle of relationship and sexual dissatisfaction, which may eventually destroy the romantic relationshi”
Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships (2010, background): “Moreover, sexual satisfaction tends to contribute to the quality and stability of most romantic relationships (see the review by Sprecher & Cate, 2004), and sexual dysfunction is likely to reduce relationship satisfaction (e.g., Hartman, 1983; Hassebrauck & Fehr, 2002).”
Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism—collectivism (2008, background): “…high levels of intimacy in a romantic relationship is associated with enhanced psychological, physical, and relational well-being (Dion & Dion, 1993; Hassebrauck & Fehr, 2002; Kiecolt-Glaser et al., 1988), and with reduced risk of divorce (Firestone & Firestone, 2004; Schneller & Arditti, 2004).”
Predictors of Relationship Satisfaction in Online Romantic Relationships (2006, result): “Furthermore, the role of intimacy in predicting relationship satisfaction in this study is consistent with a wealth of personal relationship research that indicates intimacy is a key component of relationship and marital satisfaction (e.g., Feeney, Noller, & Ward, 1997; Hassebrauck & Fehr, 2002 ).”
The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness (2007, background): “…14/24, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland; E–mail: m.allemand@psychologie.unizh.ch. ness obtained an average centrality score of 2.40 on a scale ranging from 1 (very good indicator of the relationship quality) to 7 (not a good indicator of the relationship quality; Hassebrauck & Fehr, 2002).”