Cultural differences in intimacy: The influence of gender-role ideology and individualism—collectivism
By Tara C. Marshall. 2008
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e7b5cfed88d35dd9526ec34f0c897087e9b2e4d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Does Identity Precede Intimacy? Testing Erikson’s Theory on Romantic Development in Emerging Adults of the 21st Century (2010, result): “Although, as mentioned, the findings on ego development, identity status, and intimacy development are very much in line with North American findings, future studies should include ethnic diverse samples, as there is some support for the notion of cultural differences in intimacy (Marshall, 2008), e”
- Relational mobility and close relationships: A socioecological approach to explain cross‐cultural differences (2017, background): “For instance, European Canadians were found to experience higher intimacy in dating relationships than Chinese Canadians (Marshall, 2008), and similarly, Americans rated their friends and acquaintances as more intimate than Polish people (Rybak & McAndrew, 2006).”
- How Social Interaction Affects Purchase Intention in Social Commerce: A Cultural Perspective (2019, background): “One possibility is that intimacy is more important in individualistic than in collectivistic crowds [53].”