Bound to interact: The divergent goals and complex interplay of attachment and sex within romantic relationships

By Gurit E. Birnbaum. 2010

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9f010aaefaaee20ab5ba175ba51e1991a5d896e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Amy Muise
2. Emily Christofides
3. Serge Desmarais
4. Robin S. Edelstein
5. William J. Chopik
6. A. Moors
7. Terri D. Conley
8. Sonja Utz

In Social Psychology

1. Amy Muise
2. Serge Desmarais
3. Emily Christofides
4. Robin S. Edelstein
5. William J. Chopik
6. A. Moors
7. Terri D. Conley
8. Sonja Utz

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Serge Desmarais
2. Amy Muise
3. Emily Christofides
4. A. Moors
5. William J. Chopik
6. Terri D. Conley

Citations in the corpus

• Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy (2015, background): “Although anxious individuals tend to rely on sex as a route for obtaining security and love needs, these individuals tend to inhibit their own sexual needs and default to their partner’s preferences (see Birnbaum, 2010, for a review).”
• "Creeping" or just information seeking? Gender differences in partner monitoring in response to jealousy on Facebook (2014, background): “Attachment anxiety and avoidance have been shown to reliably predict differences in the way people experience romantic and sexual relationships (see Birnbaum, 2010).”