Mad as Hell or Scared Stiff? The Effects of Value Conflict and Emotions on Potential Whistle-Blowers
By Erika Henik. 2008
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/889c5ab6d37c0e42293f22bdffbcfa382de20dc2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Liane L. Young
- Adam Waytz
- James Dungan
- Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
- Hengky Latan
- Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
- Hyunjin Song
- B. Caza
In Information Systems and Management
- Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour
- Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
- Hengky Latan
- Hyunjin Song
- B. Caza
- Liane L. Young
- Lauren N. Harkrider
- Chase E. Thiel
In Social Psychology
- Adam Waytz
- Liane L. Young
- James Dungan
- Hyunjin Song
- B. Caza
- Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour
- Lauren N. Harkrider
- Chase E. Thiel
Citations in the corpus
- Determinants of Whistleblowing Within Government Agencies (2015, methodology): “According to the traditional model of whistleblowing, the process of whistleblowing is composed of five stages (Henik, 2008): “the occurrence of the triggering event, recognition of the event and decision of actions to take, conduct of action, organizational reaction to whistle-blowing, and…”
- Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking (2012, background): “Considering the multifaceted nature of ethical events, researchers have proposed moving beyond rational models to those that address intuitive and interpersonal components of EDM (Detert et al. 2008; Gaudine and Thorne 2001; Haidt 2001; Henik 2008; Mumford et al. 2008; Reynolds 2006; Woiceshyn 2011)”
- Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing's Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs (2009, background): “This finding is not surprising given the recent research on whistle-blowing which shows that role models, partners, and "significant others" act as "organizational loyalty disrupters" that facilitate decisions to blow the whistle by altering individuals' cost-benefit analyses and perceived value con”
- The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions (2019, methodology): “Work in organizational behavior has described whistleblowers as rational actors who calculate the perceived personal costs and benefits of their decision (Cassematis & Wortley, 2013; Gundlach et al., 2003; Henik, 2008; Miceli, Near, Rehg, & Van Scotter, 2012).”
- Ethical Awareness, Ethical Judgment and Whistleblowing: A Moderated Mediation Analysis (2017, background): “Classical theory of EDM found ethical awareness is a strong predictor of ethical judgment (Rest 1986; Jones 1991) and mediated by non-rationality factors (affective) such as emotions (Lehnert et al. 2015; Henik 2008; Schwartz 2016).”