Remapping the thickness distribution in sea ice models

By William H. Lipscomb. 2001

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8896e880be540d72272eb97a3b90cae114be0dd1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

Citations in the corpus

Design and implementation of the infrastructure of HadGEM3: the next-generation Met Office climate modelling system (2010, methodology): “The calculated thermodynamic growth or melt rates are then used in the linear remapping scheme of Lipscomb (2001) to transport the ice between thickness categories.”
Modeling Sea Ice Transport Using Incremental Remapping (2004, background): “The Los Alamos sea ice model (CICE; Hunke and Lipscomb 2001), is typically run with five thickness categories, enough to simulate accurately the annual cycles of ice thickness, ice strength, and surface fluxes (Bitz et al. 2001; Lipscomb 2001 ).”
The Elastic Viscous Plastic Sea Ice Dynamics Model in General Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates on a Sphere—Incorporation of Metric Terms (2002, methodology): “…model of Bitz and Lipscomb (1999) with four ice layers and one layer of snow, the linear remapping ice thickness distribution scheme of Lipscomb (2001), an ice ridging scheme following Flato and Hibler (1995) and Thorndike et al. (1975), and the second-order, multidimensional,…”
The Louvain-La-Neuve sea ice model LIM3.6: global and regional capabilities (2015, background): “In practice, the thickness distribution is discretized over (typically 5) thickness categories (Bitz et al., 2001; Lipscomb, 2001), each characterized by a specific areal fraction (referred to as concentration).”
The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution (2019, background): “…(2015), the level ice melt pond scheme of Hunke et al. (2013), a delta-Eddington shortwave (SW) radiation scheme (Briegleb & Light, 2007; Holland et al., 2012), a scheme for transport in thickness space (Lipscomb, 2001), and a representation of mechanical redistribution (Lipscomb et al., 2007).”
Ridging, strength, and stability in high-resolution sea ice models (2007, methodology): “…EVP dynamics [Hunke and Dukowicz, 1997, 2002], an incremental remapping advection scheme [Lipscomb and Hunke, 2004], multilayer energy-conserving thermodynamics [Bitz and Lipscomb, 1999], a remapping scheme for ice thickness [Lipscomb, 2001], and the standard ridging scheme of T75, R75, and others.”
Improved Climate Simulation by MIROC5: Mean States, Variability, and Climate Sensitivity (2010, methodology): “Once the thermodynamic growth rates for each category are determined, the linear remapping scheme of Lipscomb (2001) is applied.”
Presentation and Evaluation of the IPSL‐CM6A‐LR Climate Model (2020, background): “6 combines the ice thickness distribution approach (Bitz et al., 2001; Lipscomb, 2001; Thorndike et al.,1975), the conservation of horizontal momentum (Hibler, 1979), treating sea ice as a 2‐”