Ridging, strength, and stability in high-resolution sea ice models
By William H. Lipscomb, Elizabeth C. Hunke, Wieslaw Maslowski, Jaromir Jakacki. 2007
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a45e42f82a5197f1116a9aac9fd84473d68baba5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- J. Golaz
- V. Larson
- Elizabeth C. Hunke
- Stephen A. Klein
- M. Zelinka
- Wuyin Lin
- P. Bogenschutz
- Peter M. Caldwell
Citations in the corpus
- The Louvain-La-Neuve sea ice model LIM3.6: global and regional capabilities (2015, background): “6, the amount of ice that rafts/ridges depends on the strain rate tensor invariants (shear and divergence) as in Flato and Hibler (1995), while the ice categories involved are determined by a participation function favouring thin ice (Lipscomb et al., 2007).”
- The DOE E3SM Coupled Model Version 1: Overview and Evaluation at Standard Resolution (2019, background): “…(2015), the level ice melt pond scheme of Hunke et al. (2013), a delta-Eddington shortwave (SW) radiation scheme (Briegleb & Light, 2007; Holland et al., 2012), a scheme for transport in thickness space (Lipscomb, 2001), and a representation of mechanical redistribution (Lipscomb et al., 2007).”
- The Flexible Global Ocean‐Atmosphere‐Land System Model Grid‐Point Version 3 (FGOALS‐g3): Description and Evaluation (2020, methodology): “For the dynamic component, the elastic‐viscous‐plastic rheology (Hunke & Dukowicz, 1997), mechanical redistribution scheme (Lipscomb et al., 2007), and incremental remapping advection scheme (Lipscomb & Hunke, 2004) are used.”