Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones

By G. Campos, T. Luecke, Heather K Wendeln, K. Toma, F. Hagerman, T. Murray, K. Ragg, N. Ratamess, W. Kraemer, R. Staron. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2002

1,123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/887402876188b5b258c7be56387ce88eee5ee4eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

Position Stand

In Complementary and alternative medicine

In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Citations in the corpus

The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations (2018, neutral): “The rationale behind this is that a greater muscle fiber CSA, particularly type II fibers, may alter the force– velocity characteristics of the whole muscle [16, 22].”
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. (2011, background): “It is recommended that novice to intermediate individuals train with loads corresponding to 60–70% of 1 RM for 8–12 repetitions and advanced individuals cycle training loads of 80–100% of 1 RM to maximize muscular strength (9,33,96,206,225,227,255,268).”
American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. (2002, background): “It is recommended that novice to intermediate individuals train with loads corresponding to 60–70% of 1 RM for 8–12 repetitions and advanced individuals cycle training loads of 80–100% of 1 RM to maximize muscular strength (9,33,96,206,225,227,255,268).”
Strength and Hypertrophy Adaptations Between Low- vs. High-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2017, background): “(9) Young untrained men (n = 32) High load: 4 3 3–5RM (3 min) Not reported Yes 8 wks; 2– 33 Squat, leg press, knee extension Biopsy Significant preintervention to postintervention increases in CSA only for the high-load groups High load: 3 3 9–11RM (2 min) 1RM squat Significantly greater increases i”
Developing Maximal Neuromuscular Power (2011, background): “Whole muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) would be considerably greater([35-56]) as a result of increased myofibrillar CSA of type I and, to a greater degree, type II fibres.”
Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men. (2012, background): “However, the current recommendations (1, 10) ignore a large body of evidence showing that lower loads, when combined with vascular occlusion, promote equivalent hypertrophy and Fig.”
Dose–Response Relationships of Resistance Training in Healthy Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015, neutral): “Despite that the ‘‘number of repetitions’’ within a set in RT could provide a distinct physiological stimulus for strength gains—with lower repetitions predicted to be more effective [69]—our systematic search identified no study that specifically examined the effects of different repetitions per se”
The Role of Resistance Exercise Intensity on Muscle Fibre Adaptations (2004, background): “Sports Med 2004; 34 (10) must progress from IIB to IIAB (a hybrid of IIA and IIB) to IIA.”
Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription. (2004, background): “The physiological adaptations to training are specific to the 1) muscle actions involved (20); 2) speed of movement (51); 3) range of motion (54); 4) muscle groups trained (66); 5) energy systems involved (57,96); and 6) intensity and volume of training (17,87,95).”