Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective

By Teresa M. Harrison, Santiago Guerrero, G. Brian Burke, Meghan E. Cook, Anthony M. Cresswell, Natalie C. Helbig, Jana Hrdinová, Theresa A. Pardo. Digital Government Research, 2011

412 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/885b81fad16e9991e2e34d457d1617ecfb27b912

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán
2. José Ramón Gil-García
3. Marijn Janssen
4. Maxat Kassen

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Gabriela Viale Pereira
2. Peter Parycek
3. Marijn Janssen
4. Maurício Gregianin Testa
5. Thomas J. Lampoltshammer
6. Maria Alexandra Viegas Cortez da Cunha
7. Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazán
8. Annika Andersson

In Public Administration

1. Anneke Zuiderwijk
2. José Ramón Gil-García
3. Marijn Janssen

Citations in the corpus

• The public value of E-Government - A literature review (2019, background): “The OG value is achieved through the achievement of democracy dimensions such as openness, transparency (Jansen, 2012b), participation and collaboration (Castelnovo, 2013; Harrison et al., 2012).”
• Government innovation through social media (2013, background): “In addition, social media is very close to research on open government and transparency (Bertot et al., 2010; Harrison et al., 2012; Lee & Kwak, 2012; Luna-Reyes & Chun, 2012; Whitmore, 2012), citizen participation (Linders, 2012; Nam, 2012), interagency collaboration (Gil-García, 2012b), or even…”
• Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison (2014, background): “In addition, many studies show the importance of user centricity and the usefulness (Dawes, 2010; Dawes, et al., 2004; T. Harrison, et al., 2011; Public_Sector_Transparency_Board, 2012).”
• A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project (2013, background): “…idea which advocates citizens' right to have a free access to information about their government at the federal and local level via the use of digital government platforms (Francoli, 2011; Harrison et al., 2011; Lathrop & Ruma, 2010; Meijer, Curtin, & Hillebrandt, 2012; Robinson et al., 2009).”
• Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives (2017, background): “In the context of government, Harrison et al. (2012) define collaboration as the sharing of responsibility and authority for decisions on operations, policies or actions of government for more than one set of stakeholders.”