Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics: On the Usefulness of the Differentiated Knowledge Bases Model

By Jesper Manniche. 2012

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4de527c099fff823893c55c0a0d3e44351cb4757

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Markus Grillitsch
2. Arne Isaksen
3. Michaela Trippl
4. Teis Hansen
5. Franz Tödtling
6. Ron A. Boschma
7. R. Hassink

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Markus Grillitsch
2. Arne Isaksen
3. Michaela Trippl

In Strategy and Management

1. Markus Grillitsch
2. Michaela Trippl
3. Arne Isaksen
4. Ron A. Boschma
5. Henry S. C. Yeung
6. Tom Broekel

Citations in the corpus

• Exogenous sources of regional industrial change (2018, background): “This points to a more general industrial development challenge in Oslo and some other large cities, which relates to little experiencebased manufacturing competence necessary for ‘pushing’ and processing new scientific knowledge towards commercial utilization (Manniche, 2012: 1835).”
• Combining Knowledge from Different Sources, Channels and Geographical Scales (2013, background): “Empirical evidence (see, for instance, Manniche, 2012; Martin, 2013; Martin & Moodysson, 2013; Plum & Hassink, 2011) appears to provide support for these claims.”
• Exogenously Led and Policy-Supported New Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes (2017, background): “…firms in related industries, which trigger dynamic branching processes (Boschma and Frenken 2011); the combination of different knowledge bases (Manniche 2012); a strong endowment of supporting organizations (Isaksen and Trippl 2014); scientific excellence and a vibrant entrepreneurial…”