On inferring autonomous system relationships in the Internet

By Lixin Gao. Global Communications Conference, 2000

1,291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Interdomain routing in the Internet is coordinated by the border gateway protocol (BGP). BGP allows each autonomous system (AS) to choose its own policy in selecting routes and propagating reachability information to others. These routing policies are constrained by the contractual commercial agreements between administrative domains. Such policies imply that connectivity alone can not fully characterize the structural properties of the Internet. We propose an augmented AS graph representation that classifies AS relationships into customer-to-provider, peer-to-peer, and sibling to-sibling relationships. We classify the types of routes that can appear in BGP routing tables based on the relationships between the ASs in the path and present heuristic algorithms that infer AS relationships from BGP routing tables. The algorithms are tested on publicly available BGP routing tables that contains dose to 1 million route entries. The algorithms infer that more than 90.5% of the connected AS pairs have customer-to-provider relationships, less than 1.5% of the connected AS pairs have sibling-to-sibling relationships, and less than 8% of the connected AS pairs have peer-to-peer relationships. We verify our inference results with AT&T internal information on its relationship with neighboring ASs. 99% of our inference results are confirmed by the AT&T internal information. We also verify our inferred sibling-to-sibling relationships with the information acquired from the WHOIS lookup service. More than half of our inferred sibling-to-sibling relationships are confirmed by the WHOIS lookup service. To the best of our knowledge this is the first attempt in understanding and inferring AS relationships in the Internet. We show evidence that some routing table entries stem from unusual AS relationships or router misconfiguration.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87c0f731c204e2c8f1bb6ef481fd961b4224e430

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

  1. Jennifer Rexford
  2. David Wetherall
  3. Scott Shenker
  4. Ratul Mahajan
  5. N. Feamster
  6. Hari Balakrishnan
  7. T. Anderson
  8. Sugih Jamin

Citations in the corpus