The Rhetoric of Economics

By Fernando Estrada. 2011

1,209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/878cc467b31a5ee7d159b86594b1f0d8407bafb3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. C. Spash
2. P. C. Motel
3. J. Choumert
4. L. Lohmann
5. Hervé K. Dakpo
6. Alex Y. Lo
7. E. Gómez‐Baggethun
8. J. Kenter

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. C. Spash
2. L. Lohmann

In Philosophy

1. C. Spash
2. L. Lohmann

Citations in the corpus

• Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve for deforestation a threatened theory? A meta-analysis of the literature (2013, background): “But one may gain insight on the situation by considering McCloskey (1983).”
• New foundations for ecological economics (2012, background): “Yet, McCloskey (1983: 484) has described the 'official' methodological approach as combining “an amalgam of logical positivism, behaviorism, operationalism, and the hypothetico-deductive model of science”.”
• Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit (2009, background): “Individuals framed as the mute, maximizing bundles of preferences of economic theory, for instance, are constantly – fortunately for the market – reasserting themselves as persuasive negotiators with voices and relationships (McCloskey, 1998, pp. 95–97).”
• Happiness, Growth, and Public Policy (2013, neutral): “        50       FOOTNOTES                                                                                                                     1  See  e.g.,  Helliwell  et  al  2012;  Stiglitz,  Sen,  and  Fitoussi  2008   2  Fuchs  1983,  14;  McCloskey  1983,  514   3  See  also  Frey  and…”