Toward a different debate in environmental accounting: The cases of carbon and cost–benefit

By L. Lohmann. 2009

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8183d90c3c56dda50c0b314fd81cfab9c7618567

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Greening Capitalism? A Marxist Critique of Carbon Markets (2012, background): “(Lohmann, 2009c, p. 1070) This view is supported by a number of the cases presented in Böhm and Dabhi (2009).”
Governmentality in Accounting and Accountability: A Case Study of Embedding Sustainability in a Supply Chain (2014, background): “Accounting, Organizations and Society (2 This claim seems to support the insight put forward by Mayer et al.’s (1995) model of trust whereby personal relationships are perceived as key connectors in the partnership enactment process (Frances & Garnsey, 1996; Free, 2008; Lewicki & Bunker, 1996; Powel”
Offsetting Benefits? Analyzing Access to Forest Carbon (2010, background): “…of forest-carbon sequestration through regulated and voluntary markets results, then, from the coexistence of different access mechanisms which allow geographically and culturally distant actors to participate in projects and to benefit from offsets in a variety of ways (Lohmann, 2009).”
Understanding Carbon Offset Technologies (2010, background): “These types of complication at a project level help us understand how over time the focus on calculation in the CDM has led to the prioritisation of low carbon technologies that produce greenhouse gas emission reductions which can be relatively easily measured and controlled (Lohmann 2009).”
Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields (2011, background): “Yet there is increasing recognition that these markets are developed through “a laborious and ongoing process of construction of spaces for calculation and transaction, of accounting systems that determine both who is accountable and how and what to count and not to count” ( Lohmann, 2009b”
The Time and Space of Materiality in Organizations and the Natural Environment (2013, background): “Numerous scholars have criticized the carbon markets, highlighting design flaws, failures, and pervasive weaknesses in implementation (Bäckstrand & Lövbrand, 2006; Böhm & Dhabi, 2011; Böhm, Misoczky, & Moog, 2012; Bond, 2007; Knight, 2011; Lohmann, 2009; MacKenzie, 2009).”