Country institutional context, social networks, and new venture internationalization speed

By A. N. Kiss, W. Danis. 2008

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8731e5d8d49d4a0814ef115fec129e57949df77e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

International entrepreneurship: A critical analysis of studies in the past two decades and future directions for research (2012, background): “…Julien and Ramangalahy (2003) Kalantaridis (2004) Karagozoglu and Lindell (1998) Karra et al. (2008) Keen and Wu (2011) Keupp and Gassmann (2009) Kiss and Danis (2008, 2010) Knight (2000) Knight and Cavusgil (2004) Knudsen and Madsen (2002) Kocak and Abimbola 2009 Kontinen and Ojala (2010,…”
Do International Networks and Foreign Market Knowledge Facilitate SME Internationalization? Evidence from the Czech Republic (2014, background): “Conceptualizing internationalization as an opportunity driven process (Oviatt & McDougall; Sapienza, Autio, George, & Zahra, 2006; Yu, Gilbert, & Oviatt, 2011), IE studies have viewed networks as an enabler of early internationalization (Kiss & Danis, 2008).”
Networking responses to different levels of institutional void: a comparison of internationalizing SMEs in Egypt and the UK (2017, background): “In developing countries with immature formal institutions, SMEs need to rely on strong particularistic ties to facilitate their internationalization (Kiss & Danis, 2008).”
SME international business models: the role of context and experience (2017, unknown): “Level of home economy development 1 The relevance of national context, especially its institutions, for the internationalization of SMEs has been widely recognized (e.g. Kiss & Danis, 2008; Rugman, Verbeke, & Nguyen, 2011).”
International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis (2011, background): “The latter relies on GEM data from Finland and Belgium, while Klyver et al. (2008) draw on GEM for data from 20 nations to suggest that, while the importance of networking differs across countries, there are also similarities in networking practices.”
Informal institutions and international entrepreneurship (2017, unknown): “…technological advancements in production and communication, global networks and alliances, and firm capabilities (Acedo & Jones, 2007; Cavusgil & Knight 2015; Fan & Phan, 2007; Kiss & Danis, 2008; Kiss & Danis, 2010; Musteen, Francis, & Datta, 2010; Oviatt & McDougall, 2005; Rialp et al., 2005).”