The Assessment of Dispositional Vigilance and Cognitive Avoidance: Factorial Structure, Psychometric Properties, and Validity of the Mainz Coping Inventory

By H. Krohne, Boris Egloff, L. Varner, Lawrence R. Burns, G. Weidner, H. Ellis. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2000

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/871f033b21b06b6d9c8f3525f99e952fe94b7ca1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Kitner
2. F. Sirois
3. N. Derakshan
4. M. Eysenck
5. L. Myers
6. Katrin B. Klingsieck
7. Natalia Tosti
8. Piers Steel

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. N. Derakshan
2. M. Eysenck

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. R. Kitner
2. N. Derakshan
3. M. Eysenck
4. F. Sirois
5. L. Myers
6. Katrin B. Klingsieck
7. Natalia Tosti
8. Thorsten Roick

Citations in the corpus

• Less Adaptive or More Maladaptive? A Meta–analytic Investigation of Procrastination and Coping (2015, methodology): “However, using the Mainz Coping Inventory (Krohne et al., 2000), a measure of vigilant versus avoidant coping, Burns et al. (2000) found a small but significant negative association (r= .16) between procrastination and avoidant coping among college students.”
• Emotional information processing in repressors: The vigilance–avoidance theory (2007, methodology): “However, repressors have also been identified using the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory (Weinberger & Schwartz, 1990), the Mainz Coping Inventory (see Egloff & Hock, 1997; Krohne et al., 2000), and the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (H. Eysenck & S. Eysenck, 1975) using the neuroticism and lie sc”