Returns to firm-provided training: evidence from French worker-firm matched data1
By D. Goux, Eric Maurin. 2000
178 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Administration
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85ccd814104b099bcddc12221efc7fd9eea6b3a9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Public Administration
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Training on Own and Co-Worker Productivity: Evidence from a Field Experiment (2011, unknown): “After correcting for selectivity by applying fixed-effects estimation or instrumental variables regressions, these studies find returns of training ranging from zero (Goux and Maurin 2000) to 10 percent (Parent 2003).”
- Who Benefits from Training and R&D, the Firm or the Workers? (2006, unknown): “Goux and Maurin (1997, 2000) use a large sample of workers interviewed in 1993 to show that training does not have a very important effect if the wage policy of a given firm is controlled for.”
- An alternative approach to estimate the wage returns to private-sector training (2008, result): “Some studies find smaller returns, typically for continental European countries, (e.g. Pischke 2001; Goux and Maurin 2000), although other studies find larger returns for the same countries (e.”
- The effect of training on productivity: The transfer of on-the-job training from the perspective of economics (2013, unknown): “Goux and Maurin (2000), however, find in their IV estimate that the returns to training in France appear to be close to zero.”
- Workplace Training in Europe (2005, unknown): “Goux and Maurin, 2000, estimate wage returns to employer - provided training for France.”