Reentry Reconsidered: A New Look at an Old Question

By J. Travis, Joan R. Petersilia. 2001

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Welcome Home? Examining the Reentry Court Concept from a Strengths-Based Perspective (2003, background): “As such, the broad new proposals for revamping reentry policy through a “jurisprudential lens” (Travis and Petersilia 2001:291) that have emerged in recent years (e.g., Office of Justice Programs 1999; Travis 2000) could not be more welcome or better timed.”
Social Support and Feelings of Hostility Among Released Inmates (2010, background): “…paradigm is a multifaceted look at the relationship between offenders and society and the processes that both enable successful rehabilitation and desistance from crime and facilitate continued involvement in antisocial behavior (Austin, 2001; Travis & Petersilia, 2001; Travis & Visher, 2005).”
Drawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States1 (2010, background): “…treated as overlapping rather than distinct areas of inquiry (see Hagan and Dinovitzer 1999; Western and Beckett 1999; Western and McLanahan 2000; Travis and Petersilia 2001; Braman 2003; Mauer and Chesney-Lind 2003; Pager 2003, 2005, 2007; Pettit and Western 2004; Drawing Blood from…”
Adhering to the Risk and Need Principles: Does It Matter for Supervision-Based Programs? (2006, background): “In the 1970s, parole officers handled caseloads averaging 45 offenders; today it is up to 70 or more (Travis and Petersilia 2001).”