Global Integration in Primary Equity Markets: The Role of U.S. Banks and U.S. Investors
By Alexander P. Ljungqvist, T. Jenkinson, William J. Wilhelm. 2000
269 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/84dda852ccff72ae692ff1a88dad3462c188cc4a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Walid Saffar
- Omrane Guedhami
- Jeffrey A. Pittman
- Thomas J. Boulton
- C. Zutter
- Scott B. Smart
- Ann E. Sherman
- Xing-qiang Du
In Finance
- Jeffrey A. Pittman
- Walid Saffar
- Thomas J. Boulton
- C. Zutter
- Scott B. Smart
- Omrane Guedhami
- Ann E. Sherman
- Xing-qiang Du
Citations in the corpus
- Competition and the Structure of Vertical Relationships in Capital Markets (2010, unknown): “We control for economies of scale in underwriting by including issue proceeds and log issue proceeds (see Ljungqvist, Jenkinson, and Wilhelm (2003)) and for issuer and offer characteristics.”
- Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions with endogenous entry (2005, background): “Ljungqvist et al. (2003) compare book building and public offer IPOs for many countries.”
- The Value of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from the U.S. Insurance Industry (2006, unknown): “For a different finance application of the maximum-likelihood treatment effects model, see Ljungqvist, Jenkinson and Wilhelm (2003) .”
- Auditor choice in privatized firms: Empirical evidence on the role of state and foreign owners (2009, background): “research⎯for example, Mansi et al. (2004) report that 99% of U.”
- The Value of Enterprise Risk Management (2011, unknown): “14 For a different finance application of the maximum-likelihood treatment effects model, see Ljungqvist, Jenkinson, and Wilhelm (2003) or Bharath et al. (2008). for firm-level clustering.”
- Earnings Quality and International IPO Underpricing (2011, methodology): “For instance, Ljungqvist et al. (2003) find that in a sample of 2,143 IPOs from 65 countries, 46.2 percent were priced using the bookbuilding method in 1994, but by the end of their sample period (the first seven months of 1999), the fraction of new issues priced via bookbuilding rose to 80 percent.”