Global trends in IPO methods: Book building versus auctions with endogenous entry

By Ann E. Sherman. 2005

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c557c605f1ea58843704e0e1c49ab2cdabba7438

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Yiming Qian
2. Yao-Min Chiang
3. David A. Hirshleifer
4. Ann E. Sherman
5. Siew Hong Teoh
6. Lin Peng
7. Sheridan Titman
8. Samuel M. Hartzmark

In Finance

1. Yiming Qian
2. Yao-Min Chiang
3. David A. Hirshleifer
4. Ann E. Sherman
5. Siew Hong Teoh
6. Diego García
7. Lin Peng
8. Sheridan Titman

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Yao-Min Chiang
2. Yiming Qian
3. David A. Hirshleifer
4. Ann E. Sherman

Citations in the corpus

• Do Investors Learn from Experience? Evidence from Frequent IPO Investors (2011, methodology): “Results in Chiang, Qian, and Sherman (2010) are consistent with this notion.”
• Earnings Quality and International IPO Underpricing (2011, unknown): “17 Sherman (2005) notes that methods for taking firms public worldwide are converging”
• Auctioned IPOs: The U.S. Evidence (2009, unknown): “Sherman (2005) compares auctions with bookbuilt IPOs in which the underwriter is free to choose the IPO price and to allocate shares.”