Taxonomic basis for variation in the colonization strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

By M. Hart, Richard J. Reader. 2002

714 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Pharmacology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8471ec74e6896720ee0728254618620912277e6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Matthias C. Rillig
2. M. Öpik
3. J. Klironomos
4. M. Moora
5. M. Zobel
6. P. Antunes
7. R. Koide
8. M. Hunter

In Pharmacology

1. Matthias C. Rillig
2. M. Öpik
3. J. Klironomos
4. M. Zobel
5. M. Moora
6. J. Jansa
7. M. Hart
8. R. Vannette

In Plant Science

1. Matthias C. Rillig
2. M. Öpik
3. M. Zobel
4. K. Treseder
5. J. Jansa
6. M. Moora
7. A. Varma
8. J. Klironomos

Citations in the corpus

• Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation (2004, background): “This differential GRSP production would not be surprising since AMF clearly differ in a variety of life history traits (e.g., Hart and Reader 2002).”
• Mycorrhiza : state of the art, genetics and molecular biology, eco-function, biotechnology, eco-physiology, structure and systematics (2008, background): “Colonizing strategies of AM fungi differ considerably and there is some indication that the variation is taxonomically based at the family level (Hart and Reader 2002).”
• Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition: A trait‐based predictive framework (2018, methodology): “…and Klironomos (2007) also reported external AMF hyphal lengths in soil and leaf %P. Previously, Powell et al. (2009) synthesized the data from Hart and Reader (2002) and Maherali and Klironomos (2007) and reported that external hyphal length and leaf % P were positively related across taxa.”
• Plant defence theory re‐examined: nonlinear expectations based on the costs and benefits of resource mutualisms (2011, methodology): “We use the proportion of root length colonized as a proxy for the abundance of a single fungal species with which a plant associates (Hart & Reader 2002a) because it is easily quantified and reported in most studies.”
• Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on zinc nutrition in crop plants – A meta-analysis (2014, background): “AMF inoculumwas expected to yield higher rrZn for mixed than for single species inocula because a more species-rich assemblage of species can be expected to have increased probability of presence of beneficial species (selection effect) or to include complementary species being more effective agains”
• Native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities differentially influence the seedling performance of rare and common Pulsatilla species (2004, positive): “In natural plant communities, successful establishment of seedlings may be strongly influenced by the availability and colonization ability of AMF diaspores ( Hart & Reader 2002; Hart, Reader & Klironomos 2003).”
• Impact of Land Use Intensity on the Species Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Agroecosystems of Central Europe (2003, background): “Root colonization strategies and timing of sporulation may be crucial for the survival of AMF species in arable lands exposed to intensive farming practices, such as herbicide-cleaned monocropping systems with short vegetation and prolonged fallow periods (21).”
• Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi pre-inoculant identity determines community composition in roots (2009, background): “Pre-inoculation with either Glomus spp., unlike what was found for Gigaspora, greatly restricted numbers of other AMF ribotypes able to subsequently colonize roots after exposure to our Glomeraceae-dominated field soil; this suggested that phylogenetic relatedness and life history strategies may pla”
• Role of niche restrictions and dispersal in the composition of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities (2007, methodology): “Twenty randomly selected maize plants per field were harvested 7 weeks after planting, allowing time for any slow colonizing AM fungal species to be detected in the roots (Hart & Reader 2002).”
• 454‐sequencing reveals stochastic local reassembly and high disturbance tolerance within arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities (2012, methodology): “However, significant differences were observed among AM fungi in their ability to colonize plants from spores, hyphal and root fragments using a similar approach in a previous study (Klironomos & Hart 2002).”
• MYCORRHIZAL COMMUNITY DYNAMICS FOLLOWING NITROGEN FERTILIZATION: A CROSS‐SITE TEST IN FIVE GRASSLANDS (2007, background): “…the N-responsive Glomus taxa have similar life histories (rapid root colonization, sporulation, small spores), life forms (root . soil colonization; Hart and Reader 2002), physiological requirements for photosynthate (modest; Douds and Schenck 1990), and ratio of P to C exchange (low; Jakobsen et…”
• Plant-driven selection of microbes (2009, background): “Hart and Reader (2002) showed that fungi belonging to the Glomus or Acaulospora genus had a mean extraradical hyphal length of 1 m to 2 m per cm, whereas the fungi belonging to the Gigaspora or Scutellospora genus had an average hyphal length in the soil of 6 to 9 m per cm.”
• Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies within Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community of a Single Field Site (2005, background): “These include different rate of root colonization (Graham and Abbott, 2000; Hart and Reader, 2002a ), mycelium spreading capacity in the soil (Jakobsen et al., 1992a,b; Smith et al., 2000), fungal P metabolism and P transfer to plants (Boddington and Dodd, 1999), and carbon requirements from the ho”
• Traits related to differences in function among three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2011, background): “Hart and Reader 2002b ) that have shown that members of this genus usually colonize intensively the substrate close to the roots but no specific distance had ever been mentioned (although e.g.”