Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies within Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Community of a Single Field Site
By J. Jansa, A. Mozafar, E. Frossard. Plant and Soil, 2005
174 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pharmacology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b04f6ccf2c9e3ef55ae28b1c14889df54a76969
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pharmacology
- F. Andrew Smith
- Matthias C. Rillig
- Tiina Roose
- Andrea Schnepf
- J. Jansa
- Sarah E. Smith
- P. Schweiger
- M. Hart
In Plant Science
- Matthias C. Rillig
- F. Andrew Smith
- K. Treseder
- J. Jansa
- Sarah E. Smith
- M. Hart
- P. Antunes
- J. Klironomos
Citations in the corpus
- Traits related to differences in function among three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2011, methodology): “Rare information on the functional diversity within AMF species further supports this notion ( Jansa et al. 2005; Munkvold et al. 2004).”
- Occurrence and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species in three types of grassland community of the Tibetan Plateau (2009, result): “This has been documented in previous studies showing that phosphorus can affect the composition and diversity of AMF communities as well as spore and mycelium densities in temperate and tropical agroecosystems ( Jansa et al. 2005; Singh and Adholeya 2004).”
- Impact of growth and uptake patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant phosphorus uptake—a modelling study (2008, background): “Differences between AM fungi in spatial P uptake relative to the root surface are known (Drew et al. 2003; Jakobsen et al. 1992b; Jansa et al. 2005).”
- Mycorrhiza : state of the art, genetics and molecular biology, eco-function, biotechnology, eco-physiology, structure and systematics (2008, background): “effects on the plant and in terms of the uptake of P and other nutrients (Kahiluoto 2004; Jansa et al. 2005).”
- Mycorrhizal effects on nutrient cycling, nutrient leaching and N2O production in experimental grassland (2015, unknown): “A reduction of reactive P leaching by AMF can be explained by enhanced uptake of P from soil solution due to exploitation of a bigger soil volume by AMF rooting systems compared to non-mycorrhizal plant roots (Jakobsen et al., 1992; Jansa et al., 2005).”
- Acquisition of phosphorus and other poorly mobile nutrients by roots. Where do plant nutrition models fail? (2011, background): “…approach to generate testable hypotheses on the mechanisms underlying the observed patterns in hyphal network dynamics and P acquisition by the AMF hyphae in soils, and the differences between AMF species in terms of soil prospection (Jakobsen et al. 1992b; Jansa et al. 2005; Thonar et al. 2011).”
- Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as mediators of ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition: A trait‐based predictive framework (2018, background): “For example, Jansa et al. (2005) recorded positive relationships between mycelium extent and P uptake among Glomus species.”
- Plant pathogen protection by arbuscular mycorrhizas: a role for fungal diversity? (2010, background): “This can be explained to a certain extent through the variation of traits such as mycelium development both in soil and roots and P uptake efficiency (Jansa et al. 2005).”
- Phosphorus nutrition of crops through arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (2015, background): “Jansa et al.(20) demonstrated the variation in P acquisition in different AM species.”
- Role of Mycorrhizal Symbioses in Phosphorus Cycling (2011, methodology): “In addition to major functional differences between the different mycorrhizal types, variation in P uptake patterns and efficiency have been recognized between species and genotypes of both AM and the ECM fungi (Boddington and Dodd 1999; Cairney 1999; Cavagnaro et al. 2005; Jansa et al. 2005; Munkvo”
- Impact of agricultural management on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in Kenyan ferralsol (2007, background): “…does not necessarily carry with it information about the fungal functions since only some of the functions are conserved on the species level, whereas others vary both among and within species, i.e. among different isolates of the same AMF species (Munkvold et al., 2004; Jansa et al., 2005).”