Appraisal in the Emotion System: Coherence in Strategies for Coping

By Ira J. Roseman. 2013

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/845c9add8a5097318ff12afef417777247c53bde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Agnes Moors
2. P. Ellsworth
3. Klaus R. Scherer
4. J. de Houwer
5. Nico Frijda
6. Yannick Boddez
7. Tuomas Eerola
8. Eran Halperin

In Social Psychology

1. Agnes Moors
2. P. Ellsworth
3. Klaus R. Scherer
4. Nico Frijda
5. J. de Houwer
6. Eran Halperin
7. David Sander
8. Wolfgang Scholl

Citations in the corpus

• Flavors of Appraisal Theories of Emotion (2014, background): “A first flavor of appraisal theories (e.g., Lazarus, 1991; Roseman, 2013) splits the set into a limited number of subsets, corresponding to the specific emotions figuring in natural language (e.g., anger, fear, sadness).”
• The Power of Goal-Directed Processes in the Causation of Emotional and Other Actions (2017, background): “Take, for instance, the hypothesis of some appraisal theories that a stimulus appraised as goal incongruent and difficult to control leads to the tendency to flee or avoid, a tendency characteristic of fear (Roseman, 2013).”
• Appraisal Theories of Emotion: State of the Art and Future Development (2013, background): “In this special section we focus on the theories of Arnold (1960), Lazarus (1991), Scherer (1984, 2009, 2013), Smith and Ellsworth (1985), Ellsworth (1991, 2013), Frijda (1986, 2007), Roseman (1984, 2013), Oatley and Johnson-Laird (1987), and Clore and Ortony (2000).”