Sociality Through Social Network Sites

By Nicole B. Ellison, D. boyd. 2013

993 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83d10696ba2eda905e25a90645f57a2ab718d779

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Communicative Affordances of Mobile Media: Portability, Availability, Locatability, and Multimediality (2015, background): “A communicative affordance framework might form the base of “activity-centric analyses” (Ellison & boyd, 2013) that frame the relationship between technologies, practices, and successive outcomes.”
Hate Me, Hate Me Not: Hate Speech Detection on Facebook (2017, background): “Interestingly, the connections between the users profiles on SNSs are often strictly related to the connections in their real life [16].”
Do Social Network Sites Enhance or Undermine Subjective Well‐Being? A Critical Review (2017, background): “Finally, rather than surfing from profile to profile to discover updated content, most social network sites are organized around a stream of frequently updated content (e.g., Facebook's News Feed), which is primarily populated by posts from one's connections (Ellison & Boyd, 2013).”
Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review (2020, background): “As unique applications often share a specific set of core characteristics and features, they are studied under a common label (Ellison & boyd, 2013).”
Social Networking Sites, Depression, and Anxiety: A Systematic Review (2016, background): “On the one hand, SNSs may protect from mental illness, as they support and enable social interaction and connection [1,4], and allow users to reflect aspects of their identity and express emotion that may be relevant to their lived experience [5].”
Overcoming the "Ideology of Openness": Probing the Affordances of Social Media for Organizational Knowledge Sharing (2013, background): “In this way the group chats functioned as a media stream (Ellison & boyd, 2013) that team members could use to check in throughout the day to keep abreast of developments and issues.”
Facebook and the others. Potentials and obstacles of Social Media for teaching in higher education (2016, methodology): “Some authors use Social Media interchangeably with the term Web 2.0 (Mason & Rennie, 2008; O’Reilly, 2007), others with social software (Ellison & boyd, 2013; Ravenscroft, 2009), or with social web (Brown, 2012).”
A Tale of Four Platforms: Motivations and Uses of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat Among College Students? (2017, background): “(Ellison & boyd, 2013, p. 157) SNSs generally entail the creation and maintenance of online relationships, both personal and professional, via various platforms (Schauer, 2015).”
The relationship between Instagram use and indicators of mental health: A systematic review (2021, background): “Indeed, researchers are continuously challenged in measuring the actual impact of SNS use on well-being due to the rapid evolution of SNS platforms (e.g., Ellison & Boyd, 2013).”
Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere: A Cross-platform, Over-time Analysis of Interactional, Positional, and Affective Polarization on Social Media (2020, background): “WhatsApp does not constitute a social media platform in a narrow sense (following Ellison and Boyd (2013) definition); however, WhatsApp discussion groups can be used in ways comparable to social media and are increasingly popular in several cultural contexts (Boczkowski et al., 2018), including…”
The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013, neutral): “Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2536058 Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication”
Social Media as Social Lubricant (2015, background): “Ellison and boyd (2013) corroborated this unique aspect of social network sites (but not those used within organizations).”
Social Network Sites and Well-Being: The Role of Social Connection (2018, background): “…content provided by other users, and/or system-level data; 2) can publicly articulate connections that can be viewed and traversed by others; and 3) can consume, produce, and/or interact with streams of user-generated content provided by their connections on the site (Ellison & boyd, 2013, p. 158).”
The Use of Enterprise Social Network Sites for Knowledge Sharing in Distributed Organizations (2015, background): “…caution researchers to describe the sites and services they are studying with as much care and attention as they describe their participant sample (Ellison & boyd, 2013), because although affordances are understood differently by different users, describing the technology as it is being used will…”
The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption (2016, neutral): “SNS and social commerce share common ground as both involve peer-to-peer interaction on social media, although the latter also include mercantile features (Ellison & boyd, 2013; Wang & Zhang, 2012).”
Loneliness and Social Internet Use: Pathways to Reconnection in a Digital World? (2018, background): “Future research should also be mindful of the role that the historical framework and the changing technological landscape play in our experience of loneliness and our social Internet behaviors (cf. Ellison & Boyd, 2013).”