Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review

By Adrian Meier, Leonard Reinecke. Communication Research, 2020

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Computer-mediated communication (CMC), and specifically social media, may affect the mental health (MH) and well-being of its users, for better or worse. Research on this topic has accumulated rapidly, accompanied by controversial public debate and numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Yet, a higher-level integration of the multiple disparate conceptual and operational approaches to CMC and MH and individual review findings is desperately needed. To this end, we first develop two organizing frameworks that systematize conceptual and operational approaches to CMC and MH. Based on these frameworks, we integrate the literature through a meta-review of 34 reviews and a content analysis of 594 publications. Meta-analytic evidence, overall, suggests a small negative association between social media use and MH. However, effects are complex and depend on the CMC and MH indicators investigated. Based on our conceptual review and the evidence synthesis, we devise an agenda for future research in this interdisciplinary field.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5fed8d37aa1b0367c646615098b9f39b43727edb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Jacob T. Fisher
  2. Brittany I. Davidson
  3. Daniel S. Quintana
  4. Douglas A. Parry
  5. C. Sewall
  6. Hannah Mieczkowski

Citations in the corpus