The dark side of smartphone usage: Psychological traits, compulsive behavior and technostress
By Yu‐Kang Lee, Chun-Tuan Chang, You Lin, Zhao-Hong Cheng. Computers in Human Behavior, 2014
946 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83cfac5ff6c789089b852c11106eb44500567078
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jon D. Elhai
- Jason C. Levine
- Brian J. Hall
- Robert D. Dvorak
- Meredith E. David
- James A. Roberts
- Marco Gui
- L. Pancani
Citations in the corpus
- “Mom, dad, look at me”: The development of the Parental Phubbing Scale (2020, background): “…on one point: phubbing relates positively with “smartphone addiction” (Chotpitayasunondh & Douglas, 2016; Karadağ et al., 2015) or, in other words, with excessive use of smartphones that might lead to adverse effects on user’s daily life (King & Dong, 2017; Lee et al., 2014; Lin et al., 2016).”
- Phubbed and Alone: Phone Snubbing, Social Exclusion, and Attachment to Social Media (2017, background): “Previous research discovered that mobile phone dependency is associated with increased levels of stress, anxiety, and depression (Augner and Hacker 2012; Lee et al. 2014).”
- Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students (2016, background): “Overuse of smartphones and habitual checking may eventually push the users into compulsive usage or even to mobile phone addiction (Lee et al., 2014).”
- Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender (2015, background): “Compared to men, women are more socially oriented (Lee et al., 2014), making social media relatively more appealing to them (Duggan & Brenner, 2013).”
- The role of stress and motivation in problematic smartphone use among college students (2015, background): “Regarding mobile phone use, users’ needs for entertainment, stress relief, instantaneousness, mobility, interest, information, and social status serve as primary motives for using the medium; this could lead to excessive reliance on mobile phones (Lee et al., 2014).”
- Problematic smartphone use: A conceptual overview and systematic review of relations with anxiety and depression psychopathology. (2017, methodology): “, 2014), while others used social anxiety-related scales (Ha et al., 2008; Lee, 2015; Lee et al., 2014).”
- Proneness to Boredom Mediates Relationships Between Problematic Smartphone Use With Depression and Anxiety Severity (2018, neutral): “…between psychopathology (as the predictor) and PSU (as the outcome; Elhai, Levine, et al., 2017; Elhai, Tiamiyu, & Weeks, 2018; Khang, Kim, & Kim, 2013; J. Kim, Seo, & David, 2015; Lee et al., 2014; Soror, Hammer, Steelman, Davis, & Limayem, 2015; van Deursen, Bolle, Hegner, & Kommers, 2015).”
- Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version among university students (2015, neutral): “Erkeklerde internet bağımlılığı daha yaygınken, kadınlarda akıllı telefon bağımlılığı daha sık gözlenebilmektedir.(20) Korelasyon katsayılarındaki kadınlar lehine farklılık kadınların akıllı telefon bağımlılığına yatkınlığı ile açıklanabilir.”