Do Ideologically Intolerant People Benefit From Intergroup Contact?
By Gordon Hodson. 2011
214 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety Research, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83a2bdf8fefb88ba7fce741c862d186fc3e63356
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety Research
- Kristof Dhont
- Alain Van Hiel
- Miles Hewstone
- Arne Roets
- Cara C. MacInnis
- David L. Neumann
- Gordon Hodson
In Social Psychology
- Kristof Dhont
- Gordon Hodson
- Miles Hewstone
- Alain Van Hiel
- Arne Roets
- Ana C. Leite
- Cara C. MacInnis
- Stefania Paolini
In Sociology and Political Science
- Kristof Dhont
- Gordon Hodson
- Miles Hewstone
- Alain Van Hiel
- Arne Roets
- Ana C. Leite
- Cara C. MacInnis
- Stefania Paolini
Citations in the corpus
- Allport’s Prejudiced Personality Today (2011, background): “Yet, as Hodson (2011) has also pointed out, if interventions to reduce prejudice are ineffective for those people who are most prone to prejudice, then what is the point of such interventions?”
- Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice: The Social Dominance Human–Animal Relations Model (SD–HARM) (2016, background): “With participants failing to acknowledge the relation between these forms of bias, changes to one type bias can impact the other type, even among highly prejudiced individuals who tend to be resistant to interventions (Hodson, 2011; Hodson & Dhont, 2015).”
- Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration (2018, background): “While contact has demonstrated positive effects among the highly prejudiced (Hodson, 2011, for a review), it has yet to show that it is effective among people committed to intergroup violence.”
- The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity (2015, background): “These patterns also suggest that, by ignoring individual differences, the benefits of contact have been historically underestimated (Hodson, 2011; Hodson, Hogg, et al., 2009), with clear implications for policy implementation and education.”
- Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals (2012, background): “Generally speaking, however, people naturally tend to avoid outgroups they dislike (Hodson, 2011).”
- Changing the ideological roots of prejudice: Longitudinal effects of ethnic intergroup contact on social dominance orientation (2014, background): “Researchers have only recently included measures of ideological attitudes in their research designs while investigating the effects of contact (e.g., Asbrock et al., 2012; Dhont & van Hiel, 2009, 2011; Hodson, 2008, 2011).”