Cognitive adaptation and its consequences: a test of cognitive continuum theory

By Philip T. Dunwoody, E. Haarbauer, Robert P. Mahan, Christopher J. Marino, C. Tang. 2000

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On the relevance of Cognitive Continuum Theory and quasirationality for understanding management judgment and decision making (2012, background): “Theory also does not specify the number and degree of variation in task properties that would induce a shift in cognitive mode (Dunwoody et al., 2000).”
Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices (2009, background): “There is some evidence that in the absence of external input people tend to rely on more “intuitive” rather than analytical decision-making ((Brunswick, 1956; Hammond, 1988; Dunwoody et al., 2000).”
Misconceptions About Intuition (2010, background): “Neither information-processing mode is fault-free, it has only a different error distribution with different consequences ( Dunwoody, Haarbauer, Mahan, Marino, & Tang, 2000 ).”