Comparing the Similarities and Differences of PISA 2003 and TIMSS

By Margaret Wu. 2010

57 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Education, Geography, Planning and Development

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/837a4510dfb5768be4a7a3de96e40902bdef6558

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. Kaye Stacey

In Education

1. Fabián Barrera-Pedemonte
2. Kaye Stacey
3. Jia He
4. Olaf Köller
5. Janine Buchholz
6. Ulrich Trautwein
7. O. Lüdtke

In Geography, Planning and Development

1. Kaye Stacey

Citations in the corpus

• Cross-cultural comparability of noncognitive constructs in TIMSS and PISA (2018, background): “So far, comparisons of the two surveys have targeted cognitive assessment (e.g. Klieme, 2016; Neidorf, Binkley, Gattis, & Nohara, 2006; Wu, 2010).”
• The PISA view of mathematical literacy in Indonesia (2011, background): “For example, Wu (2010)”
• The interplay of g and mathematical abilities in large-scale assessments across grades (2017, background): “The main difference between the frameworks of the literacy and curricular test instruments is the content covered, whereas the cognitive processes required to solve mathematics items are mostly identical (Neidorf, Binkley, Gattis, & Nohara, 2006; Wu, 2010).”