The mechanics of masked priming

By K. Forster, Kathleen M. Mohan, Jo Hector. 2003

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/837291f9c3ea92d5a052ec0479523c9fb9c15bfd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Morphologically Complex Words in L1 and L2 Processing: Evidence from Masked Priming Experiments in English. (2008, methodology): “In previous masked priming studies with native speakers, the size of the repetition priming effect was found to be equivalent to the length of the SOA, when prime durations were between 20 ms and 60 ms (Forster, 1999; Forster, Mohan, and Hector, 2003).”
The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming (2004, background): “These findings confirm those that have been reported on at least two occasions now (Bueno & Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Forster et al., 2003).”
Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming (2008, unknown): “Also, if one extends the entry-opening account of masked repetition priming (see Forster et al., 2003) to semantic priming, one would also predict a distributional shift, since the influence of the prime in this model affords a head start on target processing. However, such a pattern does not seem t”
Deliberate Learning and Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language (2011, background): “It has been suggested (Forster et al., 2003) that priming larger than 60 ms in a standard masked repetition priming paradigm may indicate the presence of an additional extralexical component.”
Visual Word Recognition (2007, unknown): “This result was first obtained by Forster and Davis (1984), and has since been replicated numerous times (e.g. Davis and Lupker, forthcoming; Forster et al., 1987; Forster et al., 2003; Forster and Veres, 1998; Perea and Lupker, 2003).”
Are syllables phonological units in visual word recognition? (2004, background): “In addition, the fact that similar syllabic priming effects were obtained when prime and target shared either the phonological-only syllable or the orthographic (and phonological) syllable can be explained by the entry-opening model (Forster & Davis, 1984; Forster et al., 2003).”