Motor compatibility: The bidirectional link between behavior and evaluation

By Roland Neumann, Jens Förster, F. Strack. 2003

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/83425f5380f71982ede8eeb9201c6e4c768d9f32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior (2004, result): “This prediction was confirmed in a still unpublished set of experiments by Neumann and Hess (2001), in which participants had to respond by contracting their facial muscles.”
Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task (2010, background): “According to one account, evaluations induce motivational orientations (Neumann et al., 2003; Strack & Deutsch, 2004), which are conceptualised as states that prepare the organism to decrease or increase the distance between the self and an object.”
The psychology of emotion regulation: An integrative review (2009, background): “Indeed, hedonic needs may be immediately activated upon encountering emotional stimuli (Berridge & Winkielman, 2003; Neumann et al., 2003).”
Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account (2007, methodology): “Numerous studies have revealed that planning and/or executing affect-related actions, such as manual approach or avoidance movements or smiling, facilitates the processing of affectively compatible stimulus events and colours their emotional experience (see Neumann et al., 2003, for an overview).”
Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time (2014, background): “…affect is typically associated with approach motivations and negative affect, with avoidance motivations (Cacioppo et al. 1993; Chen and Bargh 1999; Neumann et al. 2003), Margolies and Crawford (2008) predicted that positively valenced events might encourage use of the Moving Ego perspective and…”
The Unconscious Mind (2008, background): “Moreover, once one is engaged in these approach and avoidance behaviors, they ‘‘feed back’’ on our conscious judgments and feelings (so that subtly inducing a person to engage in approach-like or avoidance-like muscular actions produces positive or negative affect, respectively; Neumann et al., 2003”
Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. (2007, background): “On the other hand, the results reviewed by Neumann et al. (2003) suggest that a strong relation between arm flexion and positive valence exists, just as a relation between arm extension and negative valence.”
Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. (2005, background): “Further examples are findings showing that the processing of valence information is hindered by performing behavior that does not fit the valence (e.g., approach vs. avoidance movements, or nodding vs. head shaking; Förster & Stepper, 2000; Förster & Strack, 1996; Neumann, Förster, & Strack, 2003).”