Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account
By Tristan Lavender, Bernhard Hommel. 2007
170 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ccd99dd2dbd392902533ccd634b886d51fcb4f6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Roland Deutsch
- Regina Krieglmeyer
- Diane Pecher
- Inge Boot
- Saskia van Dantzig
- J. de Houwer
- Bertram Gawronski
- R. Fazio
In Social Psychology
- Roland Deutsch
- J. de Houwer
- Regina Krieglmeyer
- Diane Pecher
- Inge Boot
- Saskia van Dantzig
- Bertram Gawronski
- D. Barnes-Holmes
Citations in the corpus
- Comparing measures of approach–avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task (2010, background): “Other studies suggest that stimulus valence has no effect under such conditions (Lavender & Hommel, 2007; Rotteveel & Phaf, 2004).”
- Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond (2011, background): “Many studies demonstrated that positive and negative words automatically trigger approach or avoidance actions (e.g., Chen & Bargh, 1999; Lavender & Hommel, 2007; Rotteveel & Phaf, 2004; Solarz, 1960; Wentura, Rothermund, & Bak, 2000).”
- On the Nature of Automatically Triggered Approach–Avoidance Behavior (2013, background): “Other researchers, however, have suggested that the responses in VAAC-studies are influenced by stimulus valence not because they are AA-responses but simply because these responses are valenced (Eder & Rothermund, 2008; Lavender & Hommel, 2007).”