A model of inter- and intrateam situation awareness: implications for design, training and measurement

By Endsley, W. Jones. 2001

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82e77d0b9927b5c2291c96d40e632e77c6b39e94

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams (2008, methodology): “Shared situation awareness Endsley (1989) and Endsley and Jones (2001) make the distinction between team SA and shared SA.”
Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity (2003, background): “Researchers studying situation awareness have recognized the need to analyse and support the interdependencies of multiple operators (Salas et al., 1995; Endsley and Jones, 2001), but the research thus far has dealt primarily with individuals.”
From Here to Autonomy (2017, background): “…been conducted on the mechanisms, devices, and processes used in human–human teams to achieve shared SA (Bolstad & Endsley, 2000; Cooke et al., 2003; Endsley & Jones, 2001; Endsley & Robertson, 2000; Prince & Salas, 2000; Salas, Prince, Baker, & Shrestha, 1995), much less is known about how to…”
Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings (2015, methodology): “Endsley and Jones (2001) and Endsley and Jones (2012) describe a detailed process for determining the overlapping SA requirements that need to be shared among any two or more team members through a comparison of the GDTAs that lay out their individual SA requirements.”
Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement (2008, background): “…appearance of the two articles, the issue of team situation awareness emerged as important in understanding team dynamics: What does each worker know about the understanding and workload of the coworker, and how is this supported by interworker communications and technology (Endsley & Jones, 2001)?”