What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams

By Paul M. Salmon, Neville A Stanton, Guy H. Walker, Chris Baber, Daniel Paul Jenkins, R. McMaster, Mark S. Young. 2008

370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9246100b598369863f476d584a39fa88ea7fddad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. Mica R. Endsley

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Mica R. Endsley
2. Neville A Stanton
3. Guy H. Walker
4. Mark S. Young
5. Paul M. Salmon
6. Daniel Paul Jenkins
7. Laura Rafferty
8. Darshna Ladva

In Social Psychology

1. Neville A Stanton
2. Mica R. Endsley
3. Daniel Paul Jenkins
4. Paul M. Salmon
5. Guy H. Walker
6. Mark S. Young
7. Laura Rafferty
8. Darshna Ladva

Citations in the corpus

• Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings (2015, background): “The Endsley and Jones 2001 Team SA Model needs to be contrasted with another recent theory called DSA being promoted by Salmon, Stanton, and colleagues (Salmon et al., 2008; Salmon et al., 2012; Sorensen et al., 2010; Stanton et al., 2010; Stanton et al., 2006; Stanton, Harrison, Taylor-Burge, & Por”
• Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study (2009, background): “Putting theoretical concerns aside (See Salmon et al., 2008a, for a review), the level of SA that teams and operators possess is now recognised as a critical factor in system design and assessment (Endsley et al., 2003; Salmon, et al., 2008a; Shu and Furuta, 2005).”