Flexible Work, Flexible Penalties: The Effect of Gender, Childcare, and Type of Request on the Flexibility Bias

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

“Family-Friendly” Jobs and Motherhood Pay Penalties: The Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements Across the Educational Spectrum (2019, unknown): “…relies on qualitative or experimental designs (i.e., Blair-Loy 2003; Cech and Blair-Loy 2014; Cuddy et al. 2004; Cohen and Single 2001; Dodson 2013; Munsch 2016; Stone and Hernandez 2013), which tend to focus on mothers in specific jobs, workplaces, or industries, and thus, may not capture the…”
Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK (2018, background): “Although previous studies have shown stigmatised views towards those using flexitime and teleworking (Munsch 2016), as this study shows, these arrangements may not necessarily result in career penalties at least not nearly as bad as compared to using arrangements that reduce working hours.”