Further Investigation of the Performance of S - X2: An Item Fit Index for Use With Dichotomous Item Response Theory Models

By M. Orlando, D. Thissen. 2003

401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82941a176bfd391f5f766c3a11b0c0f63d9af094

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

An Investigation of the Performance of the Generalized S-X2 Item-Fit Index for Polytomous IRT Models (2007, methodology): “2G 2G Besides studies on and , there have been noteworthy studies on S-X1Q 2G 2 by Orlando and Thissen (2000, 2003).”
Subjective well-being at work: Disentangling source effects of stress and support on enthusiasm, contentment, and meaningfulness (2014, methodology): “In addition to the CRC, an item fit diagnostic statistic is computed for each item, which is a generalization for polytomous responses of the S–χ2 item-fit statistic, as suggested by Orlando and Thissen (2000, 2003).”
lordif: An R Package for Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Iterative Hybrid Ordinal Logistic Regression/Item Response Theory and Monte Carlo Simulations (2011, methodology): “The S−X2 model fit statistics (Kang and Chen 2008; Orlando and Thissen 2003) were examined for the graded response model (Samejima 1969) using the IRTFIT (Bjorner et al. 2006) macro program.”
Development and evaluation of a questionnaire measuring pre-service teachers’ teaching behaviour: a Rasch modelling approach (2015, neutral): “Next, we examined the fit of the model at the item and the overall model fit (factor) level based on the trace line S-X2 item-fit statistic (Orlando & Thissen, 2003).”
Item Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger (2011, methodology): “We examined item misfit using the S-X2 and S-G2 statistics (Orlando & Thissen, 2003).”
IRT Model Selection Methods for Dichotomous Items (2007, methodology): “Studies of model fit under IRT tend to focus on item-level fit (e.g., Orlando & Thissen, 2000, 2003; Sinharay, 2005; Suarez-Falcon & Glas, 2003).”
Performance of the generalized S-X2 item fit index for the graded response model (2011, methodology): “Because previous studies (e.g., Orlando and Thissen 2003; Zhang and Stone 2008) reporting satisfactory empirical powers of S-X 2 statistics did not consider M-type”
Development of A Promis Item Bank to Measure Pain Interference (2010, methodology): “We report values of S–X(2) (a Pearson X(2) statistic) and S–G(2) (a likelihood ratio G(2) statistic) [38,39].”
The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models (2012, methodology): “In IRTPRO the fit of each item is judged using adjusted chi-square statistics developed by Orlando and Thissen (2000, 2003).”