An index of loss aversion
By Veronika Köbberling, Peter P. Wakker. Journal of Economics Theory, 2005
573 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/824a8b82deb6912529b6eed152db45cfc3346bc5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Decision Sciences
- Glenn W. Harrison
- Gijs van de Kuilen
- E Elisabet Rutström
- Adam S. Booij
- Olivier L’Haridon
- Helga Fehr-Duda
- Han Bleichrodt
- Thomas Epper
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Thomas Epper
- Helga Fehr-Duda
- Adrian Bruhin
- M. Vendrik
- Olivier L’Haridon
- Ioana Popescu
- Florian Baumann
- E Elisabet Rutström
Citations in the corpus
- Status Concerns as a Motive for Crime? (2015, background): “Strain theory started with Merton (1938); since then the theory has been elaborated in several ways.”
- Choosing Outcomes versus Choosing Products: Consumer‐Focused Retirement Investment Advice (2008, background): “One means of estimating is taking the ratio of the slopes of the utility function onl opposite sides of this border (Köbberling and Wakker 2005).”
- Portfolio performance evaluation with loss aversion (2010, unknown): “The loss-aversion coefficient of Köbberling and Wakker (2005) is a part of the investor’s performance measure, the Z ratio.”
- Dynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects (2007, background): “1, including reference dependence (RD), and the weaker form of loss aversion (LA) in terms of the index ρ(r) = λL(r) λG(r) , proposed by Köbberling and Wakker (2005). We do not specifically assume diminishing sensitivity (DS) (i.”
- A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory (2008, background): “Like Köbberling and Wakker (2005), we assume that the observable utility U in”
- Static portfolio choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory (2010, unknown): “This trail of thought led Köbberling and Wakker [30] to apply to CPT the same philosophical insight that Wakker [40] applied to RDU, hence formulating the now standard index of loss aversion, where utility is prior to risk and loss aversion.”
- Joint inventory and pricing decisions with reference effects (2014, unknown): “The consumers are loss neutral if ρ(r ) = 1 (a2 = a3) and loss seeking if ρ(r ) < 1 (a2 > a3) (Köbberling and Wakker, 2005).”
- Loss Aversion Under Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement (2007, methodology): “According to the definitions of Kahneman and Tversky (1979) and Köbberling and Wakker (2005), a large majority of our subjects was loss averse regardless of whether response error was taken into account.”
- Happiness and loss aversion : is utility concave or convex in relative income? (2007, methodology): “Data, variables and estimation procedure The database used for all estimations is the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP; see Wagner et al., 1993; Kroh and Spiess, 2005).”
- Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable (2016, unknown): “Köbberling and Wakker (2005) defined loss aversion as the kink of utility at the reference point.”
- Risk and Rationality: Uncovering Heterogeneity in Probability Distortion (2009, background): “lotteries with both positive and negative outcomes, is not identifiable in our data, as the lottery designs did not contain any mixed lotteries (Köbberling and Wakker, 2005).”