Facial expressions as indicators of appraisal processes.

By S. Kaiser, T. Wehrle. 2001

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Nature and Dynamics of Relevance and Valence Appraisals: Theoretical Advances and Recent Evidence (2013, methodology): “The most frequently used methods consist of psychophysiological measurement (Pecchinenda, 2001), including the assessment of facial expression (Kaiser & Wehrle, 2001) via electromyography (EMG).”
Appraisal Patterns of Emotions in Human-Product Interaction (2009, methodology): “In this study, the subjective approach was adopted because the objective approach is not sensitive enough to differentiate between components (e.g., electrodermal activity in Pecchinenda, 2001, or facial expressions in Keiser and Wherle, 2001 ).”
A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion (2005, unknown): “There is now considerable research evidence, both from our own and other laboratories, for facial expression (see Kaiser & Wehrle, 2001; Wehrle, Kaiser, Schmidt, & Scherer, 2000) and physiological and vocal predictions (Johnstone, van Reekum, & Scherer, 2001; Pecchinenda & Smith, 1996; Smith &…”
Theories of emotion causation: A review (2009, background): “…words and to change the dependent variable from emotional experience to action tendencies (Frijda & Zeelenberg, 2001), physiological response patterns (Pecchinenda, 2001), or behavioural responses (such as vocal and facial expressions; Johnstone, van Reekum, & Scherer, 2001; Kaiser & Wehrle, 2001).”