Public Policy for Venture Capital

By C. Keuschnigg, S. Nielsen. Social Science Research Network, 2001

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8224b87dbf7d24713b15b8421768bbfb74970dc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Preplanned Exit Strategies in Venture Capital (2008, unknown): “Third, other variables considered but not explicitly reported included portfolio size per manager and tax differences across countries (in the spirit of Kanniainen and Keuschnigg, 2003, 2004; Keuschnigg, 2004; Keuschnigg and Nielsen, 2001, 2003a,b, 2004a,b).”
Governmental venture capital for innovative young firms (2014, unknown): “Regarding taxation, Keuschnigg and Nielsen (2001, 2003) derive, from theoretical models, conditions under which tax policies towards VC and entrepreneurship promote efficient outcomes and improvements in social welfare.”
Taxation of a Venture Capitalist with a Portfolio of Firms (2004, unknown): “11 See Keuschnigg and Nielsen (2004) for a more complete analysis of taxation in a model with linear effort costs that ignores the choice of portfolio size.”
Private equity returns and disclosure around the world (2010, unknown): “Lerner and Schoar (2003) present cross country data on specific transaction structures with a couple of hundred of observations, but do not have data on returns.”
Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification (2016, background): “These indirect mechanisms include, for example, the regulation of pension funds (Gompers and Levin 1999), capital gains taxes (e.g., Keuschnigg and Nielsen 2001; Keuschnigg and Nielsen 2004) and bankruptcy laws (Armour and Cumming 2006).”
Regulatory Harmonization and the Development of Private Equity Markets (2006, background): “…the law in influencing venture capital and private equity investment (e.g., Bigus, 2006; Hege et al., 2003; Kanniainen and Keuschnigg, 2004; Keuschnigg, 2003, 2004; Keuschnigg and Nielsen, 2001, 2003a,b, 2004; Mayer et al., 2005; Schwienbacher, 2002; Lerner and Schoar, 2005; Cumming et al., 2006).”
A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model (2008, background): “Governments may support entrepreneurial firms through programmes through which they provide subsidies, material, and informational support for new ventures (Dahles, 2005, Keuschnigg and Nielsen, 2001, 2002, 2004).”