The Genetic Signatures of Noncoding RNAs

By John S. Mattick. PLoS Genetics, 2009

721 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The majority of the genome in animals and plants is transcribed in a developmentally regulated manner to produce large numbers of non–protein-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), whose incidence increases with developmental complexity. There is growing evidence that these transcripts are functional, particularly in the regulation of epigenetic processes, leading to the suggestion that they compose a hitherto hidden layer of genomic programming in humans and other complex organisms. However, to date, very few have been identified in genetic screens. Here I show that this is explicable by an historic emphasis, both phenotypically and technically, on mutations in protein-coding sequences, and by presumptions about the nature of regulatory mutations. Most variations in regulatory sequences produce relatively subtle phenotypic changes, in contrast to mutations in protein-coding sequences that frequently cause catastrophic component failure. Until recently, most mapping projects have focused on protein-coding sequences, and the limited number of identified regulatory mutations have been interpreted as affecting conventional cis-acting promoter and enhancer elements, although these regions are often themselves transcribed. Moreover, ncRNA-directed regulatory circuits underpin most, if not all, complex genetic phenomena in eukaryotes, including RNA interference-related processes such as transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene silencing, position effect variegation, hybrid dysgenesis, chromosome dosage compensation, parental imprinting and allelic exclusion, paramutation, and possibly transvection and transinduction. The next frontier is the identification and functional characterization of the myriad sequence variations that influence quantitative traits, disease susceptibility, and other complex characteristics, which are being shown by genome-wide association studies to lie mostly in noncoding, presumably regulatory, regions. There is every possibility that many of these variations will alter the interactions between regulatory RNAs and their targets, a prospect that should be borne in mind in future functional analyses.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/82097f2afaa24280c9c52cd2fed4bc9ca2433061

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. Howard Y. Chang
  2. Johannes Rinn
  3. John S. Mattick
  4. Maite Huarte
  5. Marcel E. Dinger
  6. Philipp Kapranov
  7. Manel Esteller
  8. Claes Wahlestedt

In Molecular Biology

  1. Howard Y. Chang
  2. John S. Mattick
  3. Johannes Rinn
  4. Aviv Regev
  5. Marcel E. Dinger
  6. Manel Esteller
  7. Maite Huarte
  8. Philipp Kapranov

In Plant Science

  1. Philipp Kapranov
  2. Claes Wahlestedt
  3. G. S. St Laurent
  4. Howard Y. Chang
  5. Kevin V. Morris
  6. Manel Esteller
  7. Anna Portela
  8. Tim R. Mercer

Citations in the corpus