Carbon accounting: Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields

By Frances Bowen, Bettina Wittneben. 2011

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/532d6e11ae04ba5d19883792a90cb8dda6249824

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. V. Tauringana
2. M. Milne
3. Suzana Grubnic
4. Chika Saka
5. Tomoki Oshika
6. A. Gerged

Citations in the corpus

• Climate change accounting research: keeping it interesting and different (2011, background): “Bowen and Wittneben (2011) show how the stakeholders in each of the fields prioritise one of the IPCC’s principles of accuracy, consistency and certainty outlined in the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (2006) over the other and evaluate implications of this for developing…”
• The effect of DEFRA guidance on greenhouse gas (2014, background): “Alternatively, a lack of quantitative disclosures may imply that fi rms use disclosure merely as a means of carbon performance story-telling, with such stories not corresponding to reality on the ground (Bowen & Wittneben, 2011).”
• Disclosure effects, carbon emissions and corporate value (2014, background): “…in carbon regulation and carbon markets have stimulated the study of carbon accounting and disclosure (Stanny and Ely, 2008; Prado-Lorenzo et al., 2009; Bowen and Wittneben, 2011; Dawkins and Fraas, 2011; Milne and Grubnic, 2011; Rankin et al., 2011; Ziegler et al. 2011; Haigh and Shapiro, 2012).”