Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance

By J. Mccarthy. 2004

257 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/816177b9058cbbbaca948e9c00637bb019dc32f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services (2011, background): “Market environmentalism can be seen as an approach to environmental governance aimed at conciliating economic growth, allocation efficiency and environmental conservation (Anderson and Leal, 2001; McCarthy, 2004).”
Neoliberalizing Nature? Market Environmentalism in Water Supply in England and Wales (2005, background): “The transformation of the English and Welsh water supply industry is an example of the neoliberalization of nature, a subject that has received growing attention within geography (Bridge 2004; Mansfield 2004a; McCarthy 2004; McCarthy and Prudham 2004; Prudham 2004).”
Prospects for an Environmental Economic Geography: Linking Ecological Modernization and Regulationist Approaches (2006, background): “…often appears to be that the logic of ecological modernization is so obvious (and profitable for business) that its widespread adoption is simply a matter of time as long as a mix of international civil society and environmental nongovernmental organizations keep up the pressure (McCarthy 2004).”
Plantation rubber, land grabbing and social-property transformation in southern Laos (2012, background): “…have noted, however, his is also a logical argument that explains how and why capitalist property and social relations of production are established and intensified via dispossessing processes (De Angelis 1999, 2004, Perelman 2000, Read 2002, Harvey 2003, 2006, McCarthy 2004, Glassman 2006).”
A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems (2011, background): “…and economic reforms as evidenced by the passage of international trade agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement, and the privatization of state based industry and activities accelerated in the 1990s profoundly influenced the coffee sector (Topik et al. 2010; McCarthy 2004).”
Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance (2017, background): “An interdisciplinary body of scholarship has identi ﬁ ed “ neoliberal environmentalism ” or “ market environmentalism ” (Beder, 2001), as part of a growing trend toward the neoliberalization of nature (McCarthy, 2004; Mans ﬁ eld, 2004; Bridge, 2004; Prudham, 2004).”
Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world (2006, background): “expected to champion economic growth and market liberalization over environmental and social goals (see Haque, 1999; McCarthy, 2004).”
Primitive accumulation, accumulation by dispossession, accumulation by ‘extra-economic’ means (2006, background): “Neoliberal trade agreements have made implementation of environmental regulations difficult in any case, since they can easily be construed as ‘barriers to trade’ and thus punished or struck down under the terms of the agreements (McCarthy, 2004: 330).”
Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia (2009, background): “Scholars have observed the specific ways in which the negotiating practices and dispute settlement procedures of the WTO, as well as bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, are framed in neoliberal terms (McCarthy, 2004; Pritchard, 2005a,b; Traub-Werner, 2007).”
Grabbing “Green”: Markets, Environmental Governance and the Materialization of Natural Capital (2013, background): “…depend upon, and provides organizational legitimacy for associated organizations, all of which encourage the alignment and articulation of related actors with sanctioned political projects (Harper 1998; Barnett and Finnemore 2004; Lewis 2003; Coronil 2000; MacDonald and Corson 2012; McCarthy 2004).”