Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world

By C. Sneddon, Richard B. Howarth, R. Norgaard. 2006

724 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/059ab571d15b04cc5c9f41a07fe4dd2a076cd61e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. G. Kallis
2. J. Martínez-Alier
3. Rupert J. Baumgartner
4. Romana Rauter
5. Judy Brown
6. Bob Frame
7. L. Temper

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Martínez-Alier
2. Judy Brown
3. Bob Frame
4. G. Kallis

Citations in the corpus

• Developing post-normal technologies for sustainability (2008, background): “Sneddon et al. (2006) observe that moving the sustainability debate beyond "its postBruntland quagmire" depends on the willingness of researchers and practitioners to work with a multiplicity of perspectives: ...”
• Social Metabolism, Ecological Distribution Conflicts, and Valuation Languages (2010, background): “…Autònoma de Barcelona 08193, Spain b ICREA and ICTA, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 08193, Spain This special issue brings together ecological economics and political ecological analyses to a greater extent than has been done before (M'Gonigle, 1999; Sneddon et al., 2006; Gerber et al., 2009).”
• Global Sustainable Development Report 2019 (2019, neutral): “21 Sneddon et al., 2006.”
• Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization (2017, background): “…that influence corporate sustainability practices in the US and in Europe (Tschopp, 2005), or frameworks based on the EFQM model (van Marrewijk and Hardjono, 2003) However, the impacts of these approaches seem to be rather limited (Hopwood et al., 2005; Sneddon et al., 2006; Goncz et al. 2007).”
• Sustainable Human Development and the Capability Approach: Integrating Environment, Responsibility and Collective Agency (2013, background): “The CA provides a sophisticated explanation of the role of resources, goods and services in achieving well-being, but it suffers from a lack of concern for ecological constraints and, consequently, for environmental sustainability (Sneddon et al., 2006; Lessmann, 2011).”